Just like every other man, shopping in store is the very worst punishment, just next after going to hell. In fact, it can be worse than going to hell if you must do that with a woman. Much worse if you have to do that with your daughter. It’s not hard to figure out: women love good things and must check them out; men want to save money so they need to get out of the store, ASAP!
Would you think shopping online should be a panacea? That would be correct as long as you ain’t a Nigerian. Shopping online in Nigeria is hard as it’s fraught with so many problems not limited to lack of trust (will they chop my money or will the items I ordered be the one that shows up?), delayed delivery (will my emergency items come after a year), or failed payments (damn, did I just get debited and it says transaction failed?).
But then, many times when the items are low risk, or I feel particularly adventurous, I still take the plunge to shop.
Searching for items to buy isn’t even that bad. Search for anything and Jumia or Konga probably have one. It’s when you want to shop that the wahala starts. You will need to create a user profile, add different addresses for delivery, etc. At these moments, I usually give up and say, darn it! Can’t be bothered.
Friction at the point of payment is a big problem for every ecommerce venture. Those who check their analytics know that the cliff is at this junction.
By the way, this isn’t a Nigerian problem but something that is plaguing merchants all over the world. However, with Amazon capturing about 44% of all ecommerce in the US in 2017, it means almost half of all shoppers have keyed in their details on Amazon once and for all and probably now have frictionless shopping. In fact, Amazon patented the 1-click shopping experience.
Different attempts have been made to simplify but this hasn’t helped anyone. So what could be done?
I have an idea but let’s come back to that later.
Years ago, every website needed to implement its own user credentials. This was painful for the websites and even much more arduous for the users. But at the same time, social media was growing like wild vines and even my mother’s grandmother was on it. Then Google and Facebook came up with social login which allows websites to authenticate users with their Google and Facebook ID. Of course, Twitter and LinkedIn did same, but it never had the type of traction that Google and Facebook had.
When your user base is over 2 billion, you are a planet to yourself. Darling, Let’s book a SpaceX ride to Planet Google (SpaceX doesn’t fly to Facebook anymore because of data breach asteroids).
What if a similar concept could be applied to shopping online? You would say that one could login to Jumia and Konga with your Google and Facebook ID but that only works for the authentication. The real pain is having to enter your addresses and card information over and over and over again.
Let’s think local for a moment. Imagine a service which Konga, Jumia, Gloo, Payporte, etc. could integrate but that allows shoppers to keep their profiles, addresses, cards, etc. so that once a customer registers once, the information is available for all ecommerce sites that support it. And supporting it could be as simple as one line of code for popular shopping engines such as Shopify, WordPress, Magento, etc.
It could be designed such that it doesn’t take away from the brand of the ecommerce company (they care about this a lot) but customers will have complete control on what is shared, who it is shared with and see the history of activities.
This would be a 1-click experience for hapless men like me.
Sitting comfortably in my armchair, I think this will significantly remove friction from shopping and should be very advantageous for smaller players who don’t have the clout of Jumia and Konga but unfortunately, experiences a steeper cliff than others.
Category: Mobile Technology
Read about Adedeji Olowe’s take about everything to do with mobile technology and how the mobile has become a platform to engage and live lives.
Transforming Payments in Nigeria with Open Banking
This is the email that birthed Open Banking Nigeria. Sent just 2 minutes to midnight on June 1, 2017. Sent to those unfortunate to be my friends and so, are subjected to never-ending streams of half-baked ideas and utter madness.
It’s a very long read, so be warned!
****************************************
Good evening everyone,
At one time or the other, we all heard about how payments would be the next big deal. We have heard of big data, APIs, yeti, abominable snowman and all the rest. Unfortunately, many ideas, companies, and committees have been long on intentions but short on execution.
All of us in this email thread know what APIs can do and how payments can transform the lives of our customers, the fortunes of our companies and improve trade and transactions in the country.
However, things are not the way they should be: APIs are hard to get; tough to implement and even more difficult to integrate with.
The Challenge
There are many sides to this problem:
For the average Nigerian bank, many FinTechs are knocking on the door requesting APIs to do basic things such as payments, validating data, collections, etc. Many are developing custom APIs which don’t scale to other implementations. Keeping track of who is connected to what is a challenge. Monetization is a difficulty.
For FinTechs, (I suffered this over the last few months), convincing banks to allow connectivity is met with apathy, distrust, and unbearable burden. Each bank comes with custom integration methods and codes. Many banks never allow connectivity, so the world-changing solution dies when the Xth bank joins, two years after.
For risk managers, (you know yourselves!) the new craze of FinTechs, apps, and services is a disaster waiting to happen. The surface area for which a breach can occur expands with every new connection, and nevertheless, the product managers are blaming risk + control managers for being cogs in the wheel of progress.
The CIO that wants to implement a robust ESB solution, which adequately caters for different external applications connecting with core banking solution, is faced with complicated software that is expensive to buy, implement, support and integrate. By the way, nobody else in the industry knows how the software works and so when the smart cookie who runs it resigns, the solution is abandoned after two years of never-ending implementation.
So what is the Way Forward?
I have faced this problem in almost all the dimensions possible. However, my current experience in FinTech and as an outsider looking into banking has shown me how crippling this is for banks, FinTechs, risk managers, CIOs, etc.
However, my broad experience has also demonstrated that we stand, as a country, at a junction by which this problem can be solved simply, cheaply and everyone would be a winner.
It would be an open-source, non-partisan API standard for banks and other OFIs.
Why not PSD2 or Open Banking Project (UK)
The problems banks and FinTechs currently face also plaguing everyone in Europe, and they consequently came up with EU Government backed PSD2 and industry-led Open Banking.
Ordinarily, it would have been easy to fork their project for Nigerian banks. Unfortunately, their implementation could be expensive, complicated and time-consuming for anyone to implement.
Developing what works for our environment, regulation, our level of technical maturity, etc. may have a greater chance of success than wholesale adoption of international standards.
However, references would be made to international best practices where and when it suits the local objectives.
Problems the Open API Should Solve
This initiative should solve practical problems of payment interconnectivity for different industry player:
Banks: A non-proprietary API infrastructure which any of the FinTech and other partners can connect with simply and securely. It would be easy also to monetize the connections, set limits and enforce transaction integrity
FinTechs: With every bank adopting the interface, connecting to each would be a breeze. They can focus on building amazing solutions without wasting time and effort convincing each bank for connectivity and also developing extensive custom codes for each
Risk Managers: With a single doorway that provide a consistent interface and means for managing external integrators, risks can be reduced, and threats can be easily seen and controlled
Product Managers: FinTechs are not foes but friends who can multiply a bank’s transactions and together bring new sources of revenue, especially in the new regime of low transaction fees
Industry: The Open APIs will also provide a level playing field for everyone which ultimately allows innovation to grow while preventing bigger players from stifling others because of legacy connectivities and platforms
The Open Banking API Tenets
- Non-partisan
It will not favor any company, groups or sector over another. Contributions shall be accepted from everyone - Open and free for anyone to use
The standard shall be free for anyone to use - Technology agnostic
While the interface would be standard driven, how each bank, OFI, etc. choose to implement would not be dictated - Simple to implement
It would favor simplicity over gimmicks or exoteric functionalities - Secure
Security would be inbuilt from grounds up to engender confidence by companies, regulators, and other stakeholders
Starting Up
While the API standard would be open and free for anyone able to contribute, we all know that it has to start with something and with some people. Each of you receiving this email has been previously approached and selected for various reasons and skill set.
A draft document outlining objectives, design, and API definitions would be developed and released for additional inputs. The final document would be robust enough to be presented to the general public for adoption.
Key areas that need help would be for API design, security, scalability and regulatory.
Conclusion
It has been a long email and thanks for reading this far. Questions, comments and other contributions are welcomed.
Best regards,
Adédèjì Ọlọ́wẹ̀
www.dejiolowe.com
[Survey] Would you like to order ahead and jump the queues?
10 predictions for digital payments in 2018
Here are my top 10 predictions for the digital payment industry in 2018. These predictions are presented in no particular order and have been influenced by my interactions with the evolution of payments and other experts I work with. They are strictly limited to Nigeria because going beyond the border into the Benin Republic would quickly expose my foolery.
Yes, I know that prediction is a fool’s game especially when my metaphysical skills are zero. What stops me from throwing my hat into the prediction game for the year ahead? After all, seeing the future is not more accurate than a bunch of monkeys typing out a Shakespeare. Who cares?
On the serious side, though, it’s likely that any of these following could happen. But if the predictions don’t happen, please, don’t hold me accountable. I am warning you upfront!
#1 Alat gets a (bigger) challenger
Wema had a fantastic year with Alat; it’s digital bank that everyone loves or pretend not to love. When the news broke out that Wema would be launching a digital bank, many sniggered, but hey, they’ve a fantastic run. Sometimes before the middle of 2018, though, expect at least two banks to join in the digital banking fray. After all, Wema has done the homework for everyone and posted the result on the billboard. The new banks would dodge Alat’s missteps (very few) and amplify their successes (many). It could be bloody as they are all going for the same middle-class disloyal customer base. You can still join the survey.
#2 PSD2 instigates Open Banking
PSD2 will go live by January 13 and it would have hiccups for months. Nevertheless, expect waves of open banking initiatives to hit other countries. Nigeria already has one in the offing with https://openbanking.ng. The need for easier integration, the pain of which has been a major obstacle to Nigerian Fintechs and their rose-tinted world-changing ideas, would drive that openness.
#3 Maturity comes to Fintech
The Fintech space would become more matured as local funds start to make plays. So far, it has been more of hype and hyperboles. Irrespective of the sexiness of Fintech stardoms, real problems exist to be solved by the challengers. The market would weed out the wannabes and lightweights. The Venture Capitals who got burned from letting their Fintech run riots would bring sanity and governance. That should attract new investors. Watch out for new seed funders such as Microtraction and Itanna.
#4 Smaller Fintechs instigates price war
The cost of electronic transactions dropped significantly this year, and that spurred a massive increase in transaction counts. Of course, you can’t disown the impressive improvements in success rates of POS, ATM and interbank transactions. Nevertheless, smaller players are still having a tough time enjoying part of this goodies. There would be more growth in 2018. However, as electronic transactions count gets higher, expect another wave of pricing reduction, triggered by the smaller Fintechs who are fighting for customers and eyeballs.
#5 Bitcoins bubble explodes, killing many
2017 has been a wild ride for Bitcoins and other cryptos. Many of those who asked me to mortgage my house but I didn’t listen to are already saying “Deji, you are a loser, we told you so.” I still think cryptocurrencies’ bubble (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.), will finally explode, making a loud splat sound, taking down many alongside with their savings. Enough said.
#6 International players come to lunch
International heavy-weights will follow the likes of Opera (who has reportedly bought Paycom PIDO) to make investments in Nigeria. And it’s not difficult to see the reason: our payment and digital transaction space smoked hot all through the 12 months of 2017. Many learned the hard lesson of not staking out Nigeria when there is a chance to do so. Now that the FX has been stable getting in and out is easier. Still, should likes of Alibaba, Tencent, and other Chinese super Fintechs show up, our digital space would never be the same again.
#7 Android supports pay with Paga
While Android phones have ruled the world and they are local chieftains in Nigeria, most phone users are stuck with free apps not because they are stingy (well, we are stingy, jo!) they can’t easily pay for apps. Cards get bounced, wallets are not available, PayPal is sketchy, but the good old bank accounts are not allowed to the party. In 2018, expect local payment methods (accounts, wallets, and mobile money) to become available within Android, Amazon (Longshot), Facebook, and Apple Pay (Longshot). Efforts from likes of WeCashUp could yield fruits to bring international payments to smaller payment schemes.
#8 Fraudsters get a beating
The increase in electronic frauds has been trending well with the explosion in digital payments. While there have been efforts to collaborate to suppress, 2018 would be the year this comes to a head and expect very serious and deliberate collaboration between banks and Fintechs. Already, CBN and banks have come up with the BVN Watchlist and other private initiatives, such as Stop Fraud Africa, are coming up with online real-time APIs to stop fraudsters at their games.
#9 Retail digital lending become prevalent
Retail credit has been a tricky game for Nigerian banks. Everyone complains that banks don’t give loans except you have an account with them, spend months and even years tending the account and then when that time comes, it takes forever to process the loan after you must have submitted tons of documents including your DNA test result. That is changing with likes of Access Bank PayDay Loan which gives instant credit just by dialing USSD code * 901 * 11 #. Expect more banks and lenders to join the instant credit bandwagon, after all, Access Bank didn’t die from doing it.
#10 AI to the customer service’ rescue
The banality of customer service can drive the most patient human to madness and as such many are experimenting with AIs to help customers faster. The proliferation of simple to start, free to use, and easy to deploy AI platforms, such as DialogFlow, Flow.ai, engati.com, etc. means this could become an easy game for everyone. Access Bank has Tamara, expect other big players to go live with an AI system before the middle of the year. In fact, if you are a bank or Fintech but don’t have an AI system by December 2018, you are probably not in the game.
Dropbox banking: The backbone for Fintechs and a probable model for banking in the future
The argument about if Fintechs and Banks are frenemies would never end. And it’s justifiably so.
Retail banks have a model of providing checking, savings, investment account services. Of course, they layer that with credit cards, personal loans, mortgages, etc. Fintech showing up on the scene means one thing, banks would be losers. There isn’t any clearer way to say it.
Think about it this way, banks earn money from these services and would want to continue that way. Fintechs showing they could do it better means they also want to gain something as well. So, any of these could happen: banks would lose, and Fintechs could gain; Fintechs and banks would gain from increased service cost and customers would pay more; Fintechs would lose, and banks would be cool.
There is also the friction that comes with who owns the customer experience. Most banks loathe to see new players sandwich between them and the customers and would prefer to control every single data point. On the flip side, when customers start to use apps for Personal Financial Management and their bank accounts, they start seeing the banks as a repository of their funds or provider of loans.
Retail banks don’t even trust Fintechs as their services tend to aggregate and disintermediate. None of the banks want to be a bucket for storage.
But wait, why not?
The traditional model makes losers out of the retail banks for Fintechs to win, maybe the only way would be to have a new type of bank, modeled from grounds up to take away the arguments of retail banks.
So imagine a bank, fully licensed but whose interaction is via APIs that Fintech and others can use to connect to it. Fintechs are the actual customers because the banks help them to hold their customers’ funds and loans in compliance with the regulation.
Dropbox was happy to become the programmatic storage for many apps, and that cemented its position in the world of cloud storage. Of course, Google Drive, Box, Microsoft OneDrive, etc. support the same approach but nothing represents personal commodity storage more than Dropbox.
A bank, fashioned after Dropbox, could have the same model and would face no pressure to compete with Fintechs but be the backbone for them. Such a bank, with no direct customer interface, would be barebones to run with the most minimal of operational overhead.
Could this be a viable model?
If this model works, then it’s possible that the future of banking will be the gradual transformation to the utility company providing services to the Fintechs who will own the customers. Nevertheless, there may not be a total elimination of the traditional model though, or one where all banks become a full-scale utility.
The harsh reality for Fintechs is that banks still own the customers’ trust for now and that counts for a lot.
Being a utility player offers no room for differentiation, and it simply becomes a case of the best bank offering ease and variety of API integration (across the various requirements of the Fintechs – Risk and Regulatory Compliance – i.e. KYC, AML, security of deposits, etc.).
What is likely to happen is more of a gradual acceptance of the Fintechs services as options for customers in areas where the banks may not have the capabilities. For example, Santander is selling SME lending via Kabbage or providing Personal Financial Management via Meniga, the ultimate Fintech bank that will provide an integrated suite of all the customers’ required financial services may just not be on the horizon yet.
But it will be interesting to see how this pans out for the future of banking.
#Note
Contributions from Ladi Asuni